Zimbabweans
reacted with anger and disbelief after it emerged that the Ministry of
Finance authorised a US$4.2 million payment to Betterbrands Petroleum, a
company owned by Zanu PF legislator Scott Sakupwanya.
The
controversy erupted on Monday, June 2, 2025, when ZimLive published a
payment instruction on X (formerly Twitter), revealing that the
government transferred US$4,295,916.87 to Betterbrands Petroleum. The
document, dated May 30, carried the signature and approval of George
Guvamatanga, the permanent secretary in the Ministry of Finance.
The
instruction requested Treasury to debit a USD tax Nostro account and
deposit the funds into Betterbrands Petroleum's ECOBANK account. It
concluded with a standard note requesting cooperation. The payment,
explicitly stated to be on behalf of the Ministry of Finance, sparked
intense scrutiny due to the absence of an official explanation.
Despite
public interest and mounting questions, neither Guvamatanga nor
Sakupwanya had responded to ZimLive's requests for comment by the time
of publication. While Betterbrands Petroleum operates in the bulk fuel
industry, the revelation has triggered widespread criticism over the
government's choice to engage a private company - owned by a ruling
party official - instead of Petrotrade, the state-run petroleum
supplier.
The transaction has raised serious concerns about
transparency, accountability, and fairness in public procurement
processes. Critics have questioned whether due diligence was followed
and why such a substantial amount was awarded without a public tender or
clear justification.
Social media platforms were quickly flooded
with angry responses from citizens who saw the payment as another
example of state resources being channeled to politically connected
individuals. While a few attempted to defend the deal as a routine
business transaction, the overwhelming sentiment was one of frustration,
suspicion, and a deepening distrust in government institutions.
With
neither the Ministry of Finance nor Betterbrands Petroleum offering
clarity, the controversy continues to fuel debate about corruption,
patronage, and the lack of accountability in Zimbabwe's public sector.
- online
Editor's Pick